Question of the Week: Which product description page would lead to more cart additions? - Experiment Nation

Question of the Week: Which product description page would lead to more cart additions?

Home / Question of the week / Question of the Week: Which product description page would lead to more cart additions?

On March 4th, 2021, we asked our LinkedIn community:

Which of these product description pages would drive more cart additions, and why. What would they change? What extra data would they need?

See the original post here.

The results

Here are some of the best responses:

“B, the Nike shoes are out of style. That’s what my grandfather used to wear.” – Julian Villella

“I’m going with B. I’ve noticed many fashion brands and online boutiques are showing all variations without needing to scroll, while greying out what’s available. The price is typically already seen from the list page so going in they aren’t necessarily looking at price. Also the image for the show gives a less static feel. If I were to think of which shoe makes a person feel like they need to buy it, then maybe B does that. Also, in past testing experience, showing how many people have purchased a product with scoring will yield higher conversion rates. (Excuse my typos as I’m swiping on my phone 😂 #committment to experimentation)” – Kenya Davis

“A because the type of user that buys a Air Force one all white or other styles knows what they want and will buy it quick. All birds are “what are thoooossse” type shoes.” – Bilal Khan

“A. Nike >>>>>> It’s just a better, cleaner shoe!” – Shiva Manjunath

See also  AWA digital's Johann Van Tonder on the experimentation industry's maturity, approaches, and attitudes

“I would choose A. The main difference when I see these two pages are how they display the variety of colours. A design is more concise and tells people straightforwardly how products would look like. Whereas the B design contains too much color combinations, that I can’t even see the product descriptions at my first glance. In addition, it is hard for customers like me to tell the dominant colour of the product which wastes quite a lot of time for me to check which one I like. So for me, I would prefer to shop on interfaces like A design☺️. But this is only my own preference.” – Catherine (Xuan) Chen

“The experimentation highly depends on the persona or the target user group. For this case, I would consider this variant for a target group of college-going kids who like to spend considerable time browsing through different colour options and would like to match them with their pre-decided clothes. I vote for B – high contrast image, top-view click with more visibility of the shoe, dozens of colour options to play with, easier decision making rather than swiping through multiple options, price and ratings right on the top, and easy chat option. I would monitor a bunch of engagement and usage metrics and also evaluate the bounce rate of the views.” – Siddharth Taneja

“Any answer here might be biased towards what each one of us like seeing, which brand we are looking for, and how we like shopping online. So it’s actually hard to tell as it’s comparing apples to oranges. A better A/B test would have the same shoe with different experiences.” – Moshe Mikanovsky

See also  CR-No: Balancing between optimizing the entire customer journey vs. just the website

“So. many. variables. Oof this is hard. I’m leaning towards A though because this first screen has so much information within reach – it’s answering a lot of questions I have already. (Width, size chart) and it’s showing me multiple finished products so I can see mockups without tapping back and forth between different colors. (That said, I’d probably like tapping the colors on B just for the novelty of it… though not sure if it’d make me add it to cart though seeing as I’m not the target audience…)” – Eden Bidani

“A. My hypothesis would be that showing the finished good as a means of selecting different colors/variants is better than showing color swatches. Quicker decision made by a buyer and thus more add to carts.” – Alex Lynn

“B, but with some changes. What I think works with B: immediately visible price, customer reviews, and the breadcrumbs appear to show something that works better navigationally and it looks like there is better organization happening with the products (but I’m no expert on UI).” – Kyneret Azizo

“I would say A. Reason why is because in option B there is no brand at all that represents that shoe. On A you have the Brand with very large font and that’s what people buy these days they don’t care to much about quality but they care about brand name. On option A you can swipe multiple models and add more stuff tu cart while on option B you have only one model which people can add only one in cart while in A they can add way more. So I think A would sell more than B. Thanks.” – Arrit Gashi

Advertisement

See also  Frequentist & Bayesian: Comparison and Practical Application (R script attached)

“Nike because it has fewer options. The more you over complicate the buying process, the more chance you have of losing the sale.” – Andrew Reynolds

“B – higher contrast image, better visualization of options, immediately visible reviews, easily accessible chat, more dynamic view of product.” – Heather Hurd (she/her/hers)

“My Hypothesis is that A will have more cart additions. Users can get overwhelmed by too many choices leading to paralysis analysis. This A version has more details about the products such as color and size in the text not just images on B.” – Kudakwashe Shamu

“A… because there is FREE shipping for purchases over $50.” – Chris Hicks


Connect with Experimenters from around the world

We’ll highlight our latest members throughout our site, shout them out on LinkedIn, and for those who are interested, include them in an upcoming profile feature on our site.

You may also like

Tips on running a Test-to-Learn Experimentation Program with Shiva Manjunath

Shiva will run through WHY you want to be running an experimentation program based on insight generation and not simply Read more

Making product decisions with bayesian analysis

Positive John dives into the suitability of Bayesian inference for product decisions.

Seven lessons from running 22,000 AB tests with Ayat Shukairy

In this session, Ayat Shukairy will share the lessons learned by analyzing over 22,000 AB tests on 700 CRO projects. Read more

Women in experimentation: What holds us back?

In this session – recommended for women in experimentation and those working with them – Bithika will help identify blind Read more